Engineers are notoriously bad at organizing themselves – or maybe not.
Engineers tend to stay to themselves and are rarely mentioned in the domains of media, politics, Hollywood, banking, medicine, or law. Traditional engineering societies are weak and sparse. Nobody even thinks about paying them royalties for the satellites that carry our smart phone signals.
Some say that Engineers can’t see the forest through the trees. Others say that Engineers have little tolerance for banter, conjecture, diatribe and all the triviality of mixing with the rest of the world. Yet, few can argue that Engineers are the ones we all need to show up every day to keep the water clean, the airplanes safe, the code logical, and the law enforceable.
Money is backed by productivity, otherwise, nobody would work for it – think about that for a moment.
Why would anyone work for something that does not represent what he or she creates? However, few people notice that productivity is the domain of engineering. The machines that they create, the bridges that they build, the code they write, and the infrastructure they lay exists for the sole purpose of supporting human productivity.
Whose money is it?
So why are most engineers strangely silent in the emerging discussion about new economies, alternate currencies, and the New Value Movement? Who are these people and why should we care about them? I attended a lecture with Charlie Munger, CFO of Berkshire Hathaway who stated in reference to the Enron collapse “it’s bad enough when we lose the accounting profession, but dear God help us if we lose the Engineers”. Charlie cares.
We call them Geeks – but what is really going through their minds? What would happen if they did organize – or are they already? Where will they hide all the Value that bankers can’t find anymore? Or has the game already changed? Remember who inherited the hamlet of Hamelin.
